I design the system. You build it.
I architect physical automation systems across the full stack: mechanical constraints, PCB requirements, firmware specifications, software integration. I specify how every layer connects and where each one can fail. The building is yours. The blueprint is mine.
I define the full system before anyone builds it. Mechanical constraints, PCB requirements, firmware specifications, software interfaces and the tradeoffs between them. You get a blueprint that accounts for how every layer affects every other. Not a recommendations document. A specification.
Inference on constrained hardware is not an ML problem. It is an architecture problem. I specify quantisation budgets, memory layout, inference window sizing and interrupt coexistence before a model is chosen. The model fits the system. The system does not stretch to fit the model.
Mechanical hands off to electronics. Electronics hands off to firmware. Firmware hands off to software. Each handoff is a place where unspoken assumptions live. I audit those interfaces, document the coupling requirements and make sure every discipline is building toward the same system, not their own version of it.
Every integrated system I have worked on had the same failure mode: a design decision in one layer was made without knowing its downstream consequences in another. A BOM change that was never linked to the schematic it came from. A mechanical tolerance that silently invalidated a firmware timing assumption two months later. No tool tracked that coupling. So I built one. The demo is running a live build right now.
Your system has a fault path
you have not mapped yet.
30 minutes. I will tell you exactly where your architecture is fragile and what needs to change before it costs you a hardware spin. No pitch. No prep required. Just bring the system.